Talk:Austin Stevens: Snakemaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sounds like a whole lot of speculation to me. I think the criticism and controversey section should be removed because only Frankboy wants it and he hates Austin Stevens. So that is what I am going to do.

This is not any sort of bias. Although these sources are seemingly unreliable (forums), they are from zoo curators such as Jim Harrison of the Kentucky Reptile Zoo and a few others. I have a mixed reaction of the show, I am a fan of the show in fact, its just that some of the show seems staged. Frankyboy5 00:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

It in fact seems that some of this article is staged.Austin Stevens

Your're not Austin!!! LOL!!! Frankyboy5 18:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Wouldn't it just be alot easier if you removed the criticism and controversey section. First of all at a most crucial but simple level you cannot prove your sources are real just like that bloke claiming to be austin stevens cannot prove it is indeed him. Secondly, Austin Stevens is not really big enough to create what most would consider a controversey. Most do not know who he is, but if they had any interest in the show it would be unfair to give them information for which there is no solid proof. Thanks for the episode index though, that is helpful. MaxZorin7

There is no solid proof that he didn't abuse the animals either. Frankyboy5 23:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

As there is no proof that any of us including you have or have not. We just have to go with what we do know. MaxZorin7