User talk:Audriusa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Enigma machine
2 Thank you!
3 Sorry
4 Terminatorius blanking of IP user talk pages
- 4.1 Consensus has been reached
5 Images
6 Username signature in Wikipedia articles
7 re Image:ElectricLocomotiveCabine.jpg
8 River Image
9 Talk:Boston Tea Party
10 Image:PlantsInArvenbul1400m.jpg

[edit] Enigma machine

Thanks very much for providing the picture of the Swiss Enigma; cheers! — Matt Crypto 18:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Here is a (late) thank-you for removeing the um. . .(is it vandalism?) catagorizing from my user page. I love having my user page reverted before I even see it! thanks a ton --Banana04131 01:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

Next time be sure to sign in before archiving your talk page, otherwise it looks like an anonymous vandal. :D. — Mar. 15, '06 [14:07] <freakofnur_xture|talk>

[edit] Terminatorius blanking of IP user talk pages

Is there a policy authorizing the blanking of IP talk pages after a period of inactivity?Wuzzy 18:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

There is definitely no policy for removing useful notes such as {{sharedip|Cambridge Area Schools}} (User talk:195.144.131.12). Does this bot have en:Wikipedia:Bots approval? 48 hours or even 10 days seems way to short for en: even if everybody agreed on blanking pages. I gave the bot a stop message until it's clear there was consensus on its behavior. Femto 20:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok, waiting for consensus. All bot changes are now manually reverted. Audriusa 22:43, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I really don't think that this bot is a good idea. Some IPs are chronic vandalis, and when I'm dealing with them it's very useful for me to be able to see that. When I'm going to an IP talk page to add a vandalism warning and I see that that IP has 20 previous warnings stretching back over six months, I handle it differently than if the IP has received one or no warnings. Hbackman 23:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Please see discussion at ~~Wikipedia talk:Counter Vandalism Unit#Terminatorius bot blanks warnings Wuzzy 00:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)~~ WP:BRFA#User:Terminatorius - automated blanking of the vandal anonymous IP talk pages Wuzzy 00:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Consensus has been reached

I am convinced by the arguments and do not plan to continue with this idea. Audriusa 08:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

You were well-intentioned and you obviously put a lot of effort into the Terminatorius bot, and carefully explained what you did, and incorporated the innovative "Emergency stop" feature. So, thank you, even if the bot will not go ahead. 14:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

[1] You have a creative way of using images, I must say. :) Femto 15:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Username signature in Wikipedia articles

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please, however, refrain from using your username signature in Wikipedia articles. Username signatures are used for talk (discussion) pages only. --Kurt 02:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I did not have intention to put the username signature into any article. Where did you find it? Audriusa 06:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re Image:ElectricLocomotiveCabine.jpg

Could you please add details as to the locomotive type and alter caption in electric locomotive accordingly? Mangoe 17:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] River Image

I really, really, liked the image of the start of a river at the site of the melting glacier, on the page River. However, a couple of questions: 1) what river is this? 2) did you do the superimposing of the closeup image yourself? If so, I would encourage you to redo it. Let me know if you can redo it, before I bother explaining what I think would make it better. No matter what, I liked it (I have a weird fetish for headwaters). Unschool 05:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Boston Tea Party

Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [2]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)