Talk:Atheism in Hinduism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion recently. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Contents 1 What? 2 Title 3 'naastika' doesn't mean atheist 4 Some people! 5 Yoga section 6 Bal Thakeray the atheist? 7 madhav acharya as avatar

[edit] What?

What is this article supposed to be about? It consists of "Astika", and other unrelated matter. If you could name it "Nidish Singhal, an atheist, but a Hindu", it would be more apt. :) ^Babub→Talk 15:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Astika just meant belief in doctrine of vedas and not in the beleif of existence of creationist God. Samkhya and purva Mimamsa were very clear in this respect. Even if you reject Nastika school of thoughts out of hinduism, you will have to accept that Shat Astik darshan had atheistic views.--nids(♂) 15:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Do you think this needs a new article? I fell this has to be merged or deleted. All this is anyway covered in Hindu philosophy. But, perhaps you could do something with the Indian philosophy article? ^Babub→Talk 15:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Definately not. But i found a stiff resistance, when i tried to include even a atheist can be a hindu in the Hinduism and related article.--nids(♂) 15:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

But i think as of now, this article has enough ammo to stand on its own and a deletion would not be required. I would humbly request you to support the inclusion of even a atheist can be a hindu in hinduism article and redirect here for details.--nids(♂) 15:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Indian philosophy deals with some of the philosophies which are obviously not Hindu, under any definition. Like Ahmadi or Sufi movement. While Lokayakta is included in Hindu philosophies under many definitions. (Unorthodox and Nastika)--nids(♂) 15:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Title

If "noone" has problems with the title, I'm going to withdraw the AfD nom. ^Babub→Talk 03:11, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 'naastika' doesn't mean atheist

Naastika means veda-rejecting hindu traditions; while aastika means veda-adhering hindu traditions.

Schools based on purva mimaamsa and sankhya philosophy were atheistic; yet adhered to vedas.

Atheistic aastika traditions: samkhya; yoga(partly); mimaamsa Theistic naastika traditions: sikhism; veersaivism/lingayaatism; ayyavazhism

Hope this helps in cleaning up this section Leafy 22:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

As for references or such - first off i think this section needs a clean up... Leafy 22:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Yup. I know that. and that is what is precisely written in this article.nids(♂) 22:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

You would also like to refer to the Afd filed for the article. some users were contesting that Mimamsaks were theistic. I know they are atheistic, but it would be nice if you can arrange for some better references. Thank you.nids(♂) 22:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'll try; but spare me some time. Leafy 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Ofcourse. Do whenever you get time. nids(♂) 08:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Some people!

Some morons think being polytheistic or henotheistic or deistic or mahahajhdhdhdjhssktheistic is the same as being atheistic. Nothing I can do to help them . ^Babub→Talk 05:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Its not really your prob if you fail to understand what atheism means in the first place. Leafy 12:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I understand it very well: Belief in the non-existence of god(s). ^Babub→Talk 13:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Its disbelief in existence of a god i.e, absolute god/s. Mimamsa's devaas aren't gods - they're positions that one ascends to through karma according to my poor memory. Leafy 17:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Babub, why are you distorting facts and changing Hindu to Indian philosophy everywhere. Tomorrow, you will say that Lingayats are not Hindus.nids(♂) 14:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Maybe, you would like to work on Indian philosophy section and even expand Ahmadi and Sufi parts.nids(♂) 14:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yoga section

Since i dont have the requisite knowledge on the subject, i request other editors to introduce the section of Atheism as present in Yoga philosophy.nids(♂) 10:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bal Thakeray the atheist?

I know that this is a good debating point, but it doesn't make sense to call him an atheist because of an outburst like that. My granny "turned atheist" after one of my uncles drowned in the temple tank. She stayed away from Him for 15 days and then apparently God called her back. It does not make sense to include people who just happen to be angry at God because of their misfortunes among those who adopt atheism as a philosophical position. — Ravikiran 11:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Should this be removed. I dont think he said because he was angry. Many of the swayamsevaks are atheists too.nids(♂) 11:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] madhav acharya as avatar

i have removed

Madhava Acharya himself was one of the founding fathers of the Hindu Empire of Vijayanagar, fought against Islamic domination and proclaimed himself as an avatara of Vishnu.

and other unsourced additions to the article.nids(♂) 09:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)