Talk:Aslan's How

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Narnia, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to C. S. Lewis' Narnia universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Narnia To-do: edit  Collaboration Dashboard This box: view • talk • edit Featured Article Candidates none at the moment Featured List Candidates none at the moment Featured Picture Candidates none at the moment Featured Article Removal Candidates none at the moment Featured List Removal Candidates none at the moment Peer Review none at the moment Good article nominees none at the moment Version 1.0 Editorial Team Assessment Narnia-related Articles For Deletion none at the moment Narnia-related Factual Accuracy Disputes none at the moment Narnia-related Neutrality Disputes none at the moment

Where is it mentioned in HHB?

Currently, Stone Table redirects to Aslan's How. I think this is misleading - they both deserve to be separate articles, or else Aslan's How should be a subsection of Stone Table, which I believe is more significant and widely known. Chris Thornett 08:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I would agree Aslan's How should not be the main article - at least not for both - here's why:

• The Stone Table is more widely known, as The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is much more widely read than the rest of the series
• Aslan's How wasn't the name of the hill until long after the major event at the Stone Table (Aslan's resurrection).
• The Stone Table was an important magical item; Aslan's How was just a convenient meeting place.

My suggestion would be that Stone Table be the main article for the time being, with a section on Aslan's How (which could be expanded into its own article if there was enough information) --Tim4christ17 ^talk 12:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I support this. Makes sense -- after all, readers who have only read LWW will know "Stone Table" over "Aslan's How." --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 15:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)