User talk:Ashishvashisht
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Ashishvashisht, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --{{IncMan|talk}} 09:59, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content | |
|
Newcomers: Welcome kit | Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions |
||
deeptrivia (talk) 04:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Line colors
Hello Ashish, According to the IRFCA website, Line 2 is the 'Blue Line' and Line 3 is 'Yellow line'. I am quoting a few lines from that page,
"Construction on the underground Line 2 (the 'Blue Line') was at an advanced stage by [1/03]. Both..."
"Line 3 (the 'Yellow Line') running Indraprastha - Barakhamba Road - Dwarka - Dwarka Sub City was recently [2003] approved by the Central and State governments."
Is the website wrong? - Ganeshk 01:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- I put your color change back in. Thanks for taking the time to link up the Express article. - Ganeshk 06:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Indhraprastha - Dwaraka Subcity line
I thought I will give a reason for reverting your change to Barkamba Road-Dwarka line. Initially when I added the lines, I put the Line 3 under Partially complete section. But people kept putting it back into the Current lines. So I left it there. There is a template named, "Delhi Metro" that links to this. If you change the name, the template link is broken. That sub-article says the line is not complete. I think that will suffice. Do let me know if you have any questions. - 01:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
