Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Klerck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you have come here seeking information on who klerck was, you shall not find it because Wikipedia censors information. Try this instead: [[1]]--Fragasm 18:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

59,999 Hits on google for "Two Towers Petition". How is that not worth having an entry for? --jidar

You may delete him from the internet, but you can never delete him from our hearts. He was my friend and a legendary troll.-- Fragasm 17:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd love to Srose, but unfortunately that page says DO NOT EDIT in big nasty bold letters. I don't want to be deleted like klerck was so I am attempting to do this without stepping on the toes of the Wikipedia gods.--Fragasm 17:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Actually, this debate has been closed for over a year. If you feel strongly about the article, however, you may be able to open a deletion review (see WP:AfD for instructions). Sorry about that! Srose (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bring klerck back

Bring klerck back —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.222.209.7 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC).

True. Even now, I do not understand why this article was deleted. --Siva1979Talk to me 18:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The result of the vote was KEEP, and the content of the article was all true

Bring back the KLERCK article.

[edit] Another poster for Klerck

I'm not exactly a fan of trolling or such behaviour, but I fail to see anything that was incorrect in this Klerck article. I find the article to have been valid content and worthy of a position here on Wikipedia, respectfully more so than several of Wikipedia's user pages. Klerck may not matter to many as a "subject of study", but obscurity is no excuse to expunge something from the history books.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia_talk%7EArticles_for_deletion_Klerck_64d1.html"