Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"colin botts"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del. mikka (t) 23:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "colin botts"

May be a non notable subject. (However tens of google hits.) SGBailey 09:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

• Also needs major cleanup and moving to Colin Botts if not deleted.

• Delete. Does not assert notability. --Nlu 10:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: The title is unusable. The content smells of c&p from a band website. The biography makes no particular claim for him. Accomplishments are not given. If there were major clean up and a page move, we're nearly at the "write a new article" stage. Geogre 14:07, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: per Nlu. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:49, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Niu and Geogre. - Dalbury (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN - lots of people bott. Grutness...wha? 00:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I don't know why this one is "colin botts" rather than just Colin Botts. He does get a lot of hits on google, and this Ryan Shupe and the Rubberband also gets enough hints to suggest notability. Considering the depth of this article, I don't see why we are deleting the article. Its not like its a 2 line thing. Need some references and such though. [1] [2]. They are also signed to Capitol Records, which is a major label, so that in itself suggests notoriety. 203.122.218.47 15:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. WP:MUSIC says two or more albums from a major label or one of the more important indie lables, so he can have an article when his second album is released, or he meets one of the other criteria in WP:MUSIC. - Dalbury (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Rogerd 03:12, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 15:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.