Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZeldaPower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 18:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ZeldaPower

Seems like a non-notable fansite of a popular game. All of its claims are general and unsourced. PJM 14:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete — Any fan site that has a community doesn't automatically mean they get a spot on WP. Unless there is a solid percentage of the world's population actively visiting the website, or if mentioned by officals (of Zelda?), then in which case it would be notable. Kareeser|^Talk! 16:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Ruby 17:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, the community surrounding the Zelda series is notable enough, and their forum is pretty big. --Snargle 17:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment — One question, however: I don't see why a large forum would automatically be worth of a Wikipedia article. I always thought that the acid test for WP Inclusion was "notability", and not "community size", or rather, "quality" over "quantity". Just want to clarify... Kareeser|^Talk! 20:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. BrianGCrawfordMA 19:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Sandstein 10:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, check out the webarchive, they have been around since 1998. They were the biggest fan site with having the number two spot, after the official site, on the google search engine for some time. The site appeared down for many months due to lack in funds to keep it running. The community is big and appears to have good "quality" traits. The reasons for taking the entry down lack integrity. Please clarify why it should be taken down. What would this article need for it to stay up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.249.202.217 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.