Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You See The Trouble With Me

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as nomination was withdrawn. GRBerry 15:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You See The Trouble With Me

Besides being a hit in the UK, this song seems otherwise non-notable GinaDana 05:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

All right, I see the error of my ways. I'll rescind my nomination. GinaDana 06:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - stop me if I'm wrong, but isn't "being a hit in the UK" (specifically, being #1 in the UK, as well as #25 in Australia) a good way of being notable per WP:MUSIC/SONG? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment - True, but it also says that it it meets one of those criteria, it may border on notability. GinaDana 05:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

True enough, although it also came pretty close to the top 20 of another country (Australia) and could probably be argued to be the performer's "singature song", by virtue of the band being a one-hit wonder according to everything I can find. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Verified it being at least somewhat regonized [1]. That being said, most of the songs on that album don't have their own article, but their artists might. I'd vote to merge and redirect to Black Legend, but there's no such article at the moment. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 06:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep #1 in the UK is good enough for me. Resolute 06:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia, even the English language Wikipedia, has gone to great lengths to avoid having a US centric world view. Notable in the UK = Notable. - Richfife 06:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Besides the Black Legend version (#1 in 2000), it was also a UK hit for Barry White (that's the sample to which the article refers, #2 in 1976) ... both of those versions make it pretty darn notable. Article needs to be expanded and moved to comply with proper capitalization standards, though. GassyGuy 07:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but appreciating the amusing absurdity of the logic: "Except for [insert major claim to fame here], subject is entirely non-notable." Everyking 07:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Except for being a big planet with humans and lemurs and stuff, Earth is not notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Settle down, guys. - Richfife 17:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, notable UK=notable Arnoutf 14:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• WTF Strong Keep #1 hit UK single. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep otherwise we'd have to start deleting some beatles songs M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 16:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep charting #1 in the UK, being a band's biggest hit, making charts across Europe and Australia, yeah, that certainly counts as notable.-- danntm ^T _C 16:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• absolute incredibly ridiculously strong Keep. What next? Beside being a hit in the US this song is NN? I dont THINK so. Jcuk 22:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep because purple monkey dishwasher. Danny Lilithborne 00:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep/Rescinded All right, I see the error of my ways. I'll rescind my nomination. GinaDana 06:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• keep besides being notable this is notable the argument makes no sense at all for erasing Yuckfoo 02:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.