Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xenisucks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Royboycrashfan 13:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xenisucks

Poorly written, and already discussed as being non-notable in the Xeni Jardin talk page. Matt N 05:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete; there's a short but nontrivial review of the site here on nytimes.com, but WP:WEB asks for multiple sources. Melchoir 06:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn blog. Feezo (Talk) 06:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Mileage varies on the "nontrivial" adjective above, too. --Calton | Talk 06:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, can be adequately described elsewhere if relevent. Glowimperial 14:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no assertion of notability Imarek 21:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per melchoir ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 00:01, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm the article's creator. I agree the article's subject is too trivial to merit an entry. I created it to see if Matt N would seek and destroy the article. Matt has engaged in a revert war to prevent the inclusion of a link to http://www.xenisucks.com in the Xeni Jardin article. As far as the "poorly written" dig, Matt himself is responsible for removing content that made the article slightly more encyclopaedic. Matt is very fond of Xeni Jardin, and works hard to protect her Wiki presence. That said, I agree the article should be removed. I also think Matt should permit a xenisucks link in the Xeni Jardin article. Tafinucane 23:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Matt N is using this Vote for Deletion as justification to remove the xenisucks link from the Xeni Jardin article. Tafinucane 23:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.