Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Offender

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 ^talk 20:29, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] X-Offender

Not enough relevance to have a page just for it. There's an article for Blondie (band), so merge and then delete. Lucio 11:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

• "Merge and Delete" is incompatible with the GFDL. If a merge is done, a redirect has to be left in place to preserve the article's history. android79 11:49, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
• GFDL only requires that the history be kept. This article has trivial history (Page creation only), so the history could be moved. But I'll agree with redirect. Lucio 12:26, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep, a classic early Blondies tune and just about adequately notable jamesgibbon 13:14, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable Blondie single with potential for expansion see [1]. If it were to be merged, merge with Blondie (album) which is the album it comes from. Capitalistroadster 20:14, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Blondie (album) as per above. Hamster Sandwich 20:46, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
  • I have added to the article. No change of vote from keep. Capitalistroadster 02:38, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I see no good reasons to delete or merge this article. It has only recently been created. Give it time to expand. JamesBurns 04:59, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Wikipedia is not paper. Notable debut single by Blondie. Iam 01:15, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep in agreement with Iam. Punkmorten 22:06, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.