Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyvern920

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted by Marudubshinki. -- JLaTondre 04:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wyvern920

Non-notable website. Vanity article by User:Wyvern920 (and sock puppet Nojkceb). Alexa has no traffic data for it. -- RHaworth 06:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

RHaworth, I have been involved in some of the editing of Wyvern920.com so I am indeed connected with the site. However, I do not see this entry as shameless self-promotion. As we try to grow Wyvern920 into a more widely read news-humor blog I think a wiki description and history are acceptable. I do see your point that the article might appear as a mere vanity article, but since a rather small number of people know the complete, detailed history of the site, I think it is appropriate that we do the writing. Any suggestions as to improve the entry would be appreciated. --Nojkceb 07:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 06:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. JQ 06:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable and unencyclopedic. Bucketsofg 08:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Basic rule of thumb: if you need to create the article about yourself/your company/your website/etc. yourself, it's not notable. Nojkceb said it all with "As we try to grow Wyvern920 into a more widely read news-humor blog..." If it becomes notable in the future, then those who know the history can fill in the blanks. Until then, no dice. --Icarus 10:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable.--rhmoore 11:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 12:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, doesn't meet WP:WEB; if only a few people know the complete, detailed history of the site to write a detailed article about it, then it's probably not notable. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

According to the rules of WP:WEB, this site is not-notable, so we will remove it. It doesn't seem like it's causing any harm to have a page history exist for the site but if rules prohibit that then we'll procede according to those. --Nojkceb 20:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Kudos on the nn concession, if only more were like you. Deizio 01:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 00:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Deizio 01:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per author request, tagged as such. --Rory096 06:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - he took one hell of an effort to write all that though. +Hexagon1 (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.