Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.texascruisers.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Infrogmation. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Www.texascruisers.com

Not named properly, weasel words but could be fixed. What can't be is notability. I can't find an Alexa rating for it but I doubt it would meet WP:WEB. Daniel Case 02:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete I think it would be tough to meet WP:WEB when the website was created yesterday. The site is just a forum that currently has 1 member (same user who created the article and is listed as the owner of the site) and 5 posts. DrunkenSmurf 03:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Only 33 results for texascruisers on google [1]. --Sbluen 03:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete More about motorcycling than the stated subject. Hard to meet WP:WEB when started this month and only 5 posts. At least the article got us to visit the site. :) Dlohcierekim 04:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence (and no chance) that this meets WP:WEB. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per DrunkenSmurf Pinkstarmaci 05:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Sbluen and Drunkensmurf - a brand-new web site has absolutely no claim to notability. Zetawoof^(ζ) 06:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, not even close to meeting WP:WEB. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete promotional article. "TexasCruisers.com was started in August 2006" that was 4 days ago. Time will tell if it is notable and that time has not passed yet. --HResearcher 07:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable website, looks like vanity. JIP | Talk 07:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable website. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 08:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - somehow I can't see a 4 day old site being notable.--Andeh 09:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete based on WP:SPEEDY#Articles #7. --Wafulz 15:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy deleted. -- Infrogmation 15:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.