Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wounded Soldier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wounded Soldier

Neologism, deprodded. Accurizer 04:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Neologism. It made me laugh though. Adambiswanger1 04:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A good neologism. I hope it catches on. Right now, it doesn't warrant an article. Ace of Sevens 04:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for now, but I'm going to do everything in my power to make this a common term. fuzzy510 06:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Sandstein 06:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  08:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I agree it's good though, how about BJAODN? --Tango 15:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to Casualty (person). --Allen 16:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 19:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete, actually I have heard a variant of this numerous times in the last decade or so and used it myself, but usually as Dead soldier. Maybe that means I am getting old though since nobody else has heard of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DrunkenSmurf (talk • contribs).
  • Comment To be fair I will nominate Dead soldier separately. Accurizer 18:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.