Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World correspondence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 19:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World correspondence

Interesting goal, but Wikipedia is not the place to announce it or the site you made for it.-- Perfecto 01:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:WEB. --Perfecto 01:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per perfecto. A nice, respectful nom, too. ×Meegs 01:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Thank you. OK, I'll remember to be respectful more often. --Perfecto 02:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom (although it surely is an interesting idea). Joe 04:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. But I agree, it is a worthwhile and refreshingly unique pursuit for a change. StarryEyes 11:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails to meet WP:WEB criteria. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 22:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.