Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winfield Reformed Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily Kept per popular demand — Adrian Lamo ·· 20:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Winfield Reformed Church

users abuse this page, taking opportunities to write lies and spread malicious rumors about the church and people Christianlove 15:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep - Nominator has been repeatedly vandalizing this page as can be seen in the page history. I also recommend a block for the nominator ({{test4}} has already been used). —Cuiviénen, 15:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I think he was just trying to learn how the deletion system works, clearly he's figured it out by now (with a possible exception for what to nominate as opposed to how). --Obli (Talk)^? 16:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Even if the nominator's reason were well-founded (and it's difficult to see what exactly he's objecting to, as he doesn't say, he simply blanks the page), it wouldn't be grounds for an AfD. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if there are factual erroes in the article then they should be fixed. If there are unverfied rumours then they should be removed. But i see no reason to delete the article. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --Obli (Talk)^? 16:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, bad faith nom. Article should be maintained just as any other - if he has problems, take it to the article's talk page and debate it, but simply blanking the article is not acceptable. Kuru ^talk 16:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, no valid reason for AfD nomination. I'm guessing nominator is new to Wikipedia. If the article has errors you can simply fix them. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit! And don't mind an occasional lie or rumor, there are lots of people who help you fix them if they occur. I put the article on my watchlist, I'll help remove any obvious vandalism. Weregerbil 17:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, bad faith AFD nomination. --Terence Ong 17:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

  Not bad faith, just ignorant of Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep as per all. Perhaps someone should coach Christianlove on what AfD is for. Bucketsofg 18:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.