Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Vespa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Windows Vespa

Non-notable software that is stated to cause 'whiplash' and 'death'. Speedy delete pulled twice without explanation. Delete. DMG413 02:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Unfunny jokes, contains the word "solutions," author does not suitly emphazi notability. Brian G. Crawford 02:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom ConDem^Talk 03:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Leidiot 03:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete and purge from system. A2Kafir 03:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, probable hoax. Grandmasterka 03:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not even a BJAODN candidate. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT and WP:HOAX. Royboycrashfan 04:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not even funny.--MONGO 04:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Awesome! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.138.221.19 (talk • contribs).

• Delete, some sort of hoax or joke. JIP | Talk 06:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Brian said it above. Unfunny, badly written, "solutions." Nuff said. ProhibitOnions 09:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete hoax ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. Send it to BJAODN. --Terence Ong 11:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per above. --Off! 23:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

wow, pride is a sin, you guys aren't Brittanica —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sabud (talk • contribs).

Personal attacks against no one in particular aren't very effective, now are they? =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Calling this a "hoax" would also require throughout readjustment of the definition of the expression "stating the obvious". Not funny enough for BJAODN. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

You haven't seen the commercials? Farce? I think not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.138.221.19 (talk • contribs).

• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.