Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinSrev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WinSrev

Self-promotion. Site down when tried to access. Google hits bb developer discusions/promotion. —ERcheck @ 00:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Self-promotion/ad for "we hope to have ...". See WP:NOT - soapbox/#3 advertising. —ERcheck @ 00:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per ER check. Also, it is ranked #1,422,080 in Alexa. SYCTHOS^talk 00:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 01:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Something that has been around for "one year" (which was really 9 months) should do better than a mere 100,000 wep pages. Self-promotion Kareeser|^Talk! 01:36, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --M@thwiz2020 02:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because "WinSrev might not be popular now but we hope that WinSrev will become more popular" Ruby 02:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• 'Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nick Catalano (Talk) 11:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete still in beta. Hmmm, I can see that a non-notable software speedy criterion might have some merit here... Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 15:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable software. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-27 21:05Z
• Delete per nom. —This user has left wikipedia 01:09 2006-01-28
• Delete per nom. Blnguyen 07:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.