Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilmington Refinery (Shell)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wilmington Refinery (Shell)

This article is about a refinery. Nobody seems to care since the page has not been edited (except for minor wikying tweaks) since its creation 8 months ago. The Shell refinery (which the article is about) is only the 10th refinery (in terms of output) in the state of California [1]. Pascal.Tesson 06:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom., or move to a more suitable list if it exists, hopefully not. (I hate lists). Rob 09:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NN.--Wine Guy Talk 22:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia does not have any requirements about recency of editing or ranking of refineries. Fg2 03:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• keep please no real reason for deletion Yuckfoo 06:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Comment To be more precise, I think this fails WP:CORP. Obviously I am not saying that the page should be deleted because it has not been edited or because it is not a top-ranking one. I am just pointing out the indications of the limited importance of the refinery. Pascal.Tesson 16:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non notable industrial location. -- GWO
• Delete as non-notable, but I sincerely hope that lack of edits is not an indicator of importance. If anything, it is an indicator of systemic bias. --Aguerriero (talk) 17:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete wp:ver Ste4k 03:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.