Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilberforce (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [20:40, 10 April 2006]

[edit] Wilberforce (band)

Non-notable. Nothing on allmusic. 21 Ghits for Search&as_epq=Madame Fruitbowl&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=off . Have played to audiences does not constitute a tour. Upcoming tours are crystal ball.

• Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 16:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, inspiration explanation. Royboycrashfan 01:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I was inclined to a weak keep vote, until I checked the site for Newlove Records which does not seem to be a substantial commercial label. This band does not seem to have done enough to be notable, taking all the claims at face value. Metamagician3000 01:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Brian G. Crawford 02:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Terence Ong 03:32, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 04:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable band. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-04-09 08:18Z
• Delete only one article cited. very few valid google hits.  : ( Lonesomedovechocolate 09:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.