Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikijihad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 03:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikijihad
Neologism. consider BJAODN or delete. User:Daniel Lotspeich 18:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete This heretical neologism.--Isotope23 18:59, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Burn it at the stake. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 20:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - horrible, must die. --MacRusgail 20:29, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity. *drew 20:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity, neologism, and dicdef. - Pureblade | Word 21:39, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to m:Association of Deletionist Wikipedians--Nicodemus75 21:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, okay, but what's your real vote? Interwiki redirects aren't kosher, and, well, that doesn't seem serious. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 21:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Nor does "Burn it at the stake" :P the wub "?!" 22:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Silly synonyms for destruction are delete votes. Granted, it's not like your vote or mine are needed to establish consensus at this point. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 02:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Nor does "Burn it at the stake" :P the wub "?!" 22:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, okay, but what's your real vote? Interwiki redirects aren't kosher, and, well, that doesn't seem serious. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 21:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Obviously. the wub "?!" 22:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as really tiresomely dumb. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:41, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment - I also hate all these crappy portmanteaux. There's too many of them, and most of them are no good. --MacRusgail 12:12, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
