Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki fixers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki fixers

Prod tag removed without comment. No need for this page as we have WP:CU already. Group and website are not notable. Daniel Case 05:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

==== Responce ====
1. Im new to wikipedia, the banner thing said to delete it if we dissagreed and i do.

Yes, but that means it goes over here.

2. we are mearly trying to help, we are aware of the clean up campain, this is just a suppliment, 2 is always better then 1, and 3 is better th4en 2. so anyone elce starts one, that wont be a bad thing either. think of it like a milita, theres the army whitch does most of the work, we just try our best to do more then our fair shair.

All of us here are by default part of the cleanup crew.

I never thought I'd watch myself type this, but Wikipedia is not an MMPORPG. You are certainly welcome to have your group and website and do what you do. It just doesn't merit an article, especially seeing as we work hard to avoid self-referentialism here. I would commend you to the project namespace but, as I said, we already have something for that.

3. daniel case is a known obsessive deleter. he puts more deletion noices up then their are articles, ive been here a week and ive seen 3 deletion banner put up by him.

And this is a slow week, too :-). Like you said, there's the army and there's the militia. Daniel Case 05:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

--Hammerfist0 05:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete NN and should not be part of the main Wikipedia. I am also a little concerned about people claiming to be fixers when they can't spell or use English grammar in their posts. Maustrauser 05:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete,clearly, per Maustrauser. Makemi 05:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:CSD, A7. Group is extremely non-notable and Wikipedia-specific. Content might be appropriate for a user page. dbtfz^talk 05:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable Wikicruft (is that a cromulent word?) per nom and the excellent irony noted by Maustrauser. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. —ERcheck @ 13:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, though I suppose it could be Userfied as an unofficial thing. Maustrauser has a point though! -- Mithent 16:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Maustrauser. --Maxamegalon2000 21:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, doesn't belong in main namespace. Pavel Vozenilek 22:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy if the user wants that - user space is better for this kind of stuff. It really has no reason to be in main namespace in any case. If not userfied, Delete. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - don't need this further paving the road to Hell. Grutness...wha? 01:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Surely well within the scope of A7. I'd be happy to see this userfied first if User:Hammerfist0 would like to do that. AndyJones 11:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or userfy. Redundant to WP:CU. Stifle 22:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.