Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki crack

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:18 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki crack

Neologism, slang dicdef, self reference to Wikipedia. Thue | talk 06:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete slang neologism. JamesBurns 08:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism... although the fact that I'm doing this at 5:30 AM - when I should be studying for the bar - almost makes me think there's something to it. -- BD2412 ^talk 09:36, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
• marginal Keep; acceptable neologism. jamesgibbon 15:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Thue. What is an "acceptable neologism" under WP policy? Barno 17:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We don't need to be as narcissistic as our vanity page writers. --Scimitar 19:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism.
• Delete. No such thing as an "acceptable neologism" --Carnildo 21:07, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete The article in question does not make any special attempt to define the term and uses it only once, late in the article. -Harmil 21:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. To keep would be self-vanity. -Splash 23:05, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ha ha ha ha --GrandCru 19:37, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.