Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wierd Studio Bunch

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Fernando Rizo T/C 00:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wierd_Studio_Bunch

Vanity 195.92.168.166 10:31, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable. Nandesuka 11:09, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Will be notable when merged with other content relating to contributors to the group. Can see point about possible vanity/non-notable, only I need more time to adjust content to make more valid - Should be of interets to comic fans?? ThanksUser:Wierd Studio Bunch 12:12 11 August 2005
• Delete Vanity, not notable. No Google hits (none under "Weird Studio Bunch" either) make it unverifiable, possible hoax. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:54, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - no google hits for "Wierd Studio Bunch", or even for "Weird Studio Bunch" (with Weird spelled correctly). Note I have redirected a couple of substubs to this page as well which will also need deleting. -- Francs2000 | Talk 11:55, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity or hoax. Don't forget those substub articles pointing to that article, I made them into redirects already as they had no actual contents beyond "see Wierd Studio Bunch". andy 11:57, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment OK.. go ahead and delete this.. Will create better content and then re-submit. Sorry, this honestly isn't a hoax. I'm a newbie and probably should formulate my content better before submission. I was planning to add entries for Glyn Dillon and Alan Martin in a similar vein to Jamie Hewlett of Gorillaz fame, as they all worked together under the Wierd (sic) Studio Bunch moniker (also Big Underwear Comix) in the late 80's. Again, thought this may have been of interest to Tankl Girl and comic fans... Thanks for your comments. User:Wierd Studio Bunch 13:11 August 11.
  • Thanks for your understanding. Please note, though, that Wikipedia does not accept unverifiable material. This means that, since this subject doesn't show up on Google at all, you'll have to provide references of some kind (newspaper, book, or periodical mentions, for example) for the article to be kept, no matter how detailed, extensive, or well-written it is. Remember, above all, that deletion isn't anything personal against you or the article subject. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:22, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.