Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whip Jones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Whip Jones

Whip Jones (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

also consider Robert P. McCulloch

A lot of detail, but I don't see anything notable. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as NN - and reads close to a G11. - crz crztalk 03:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment; contested speedy, and part of a family of relatives, probably of the article creator. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 04:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 04:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - verging on speedy, really nn. SkierRMH,07:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to join Robert P. McCulloch to this, as another bio by the same author, but can't figure out how to do it- directions or help would be appreciated!SkierRMH 07:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I've bundled this. You can see how I did it if you look at Robert P. McCulloch.--Isotope23 15:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Whip Jones as subject doesn't meet WP:BIO and move back Whip Jones III (Bold and the Beautiful) to this namespace. Consider getting rid of Whip Jones (disambiguation) at the same time because it isn't necessary if this article gets deleted. Redirect Robert P. McCulloch to London Bridge. McCulloch did purchase the original London Bridge and move it to Lake Havasu, AZ... but to me that isn't enough to meet WP:BIO and that fact is mentioned at London Bridge. Everything else in the article on McCulloch is inconsequential and it would be redundant to just grab the paragraph from London Bridge and post it at the Robert P. McCulloch namespace.--Isotope23 15:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• (Second vote on added person). Keep Robert P. McCulloch, but move back to Robert McCulloch. I think a "city founder" (if that's correct) is adequately notable. Much of the article still needs to be trimmed, but I think there's enough there for retention. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• How did I miss that he founded the city? stuck opinion above. I've cleaned the article up a bit, though it could use more cleanup...--Isotope23 18:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)