Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Eastridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Westfield Eastridge

This is an advertisement that does not add any valuable content to wikipedia Richardcavell 01:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nn Lakhim 01:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn Jadriaen 01:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no attempt to assert notabilty, unless using ths advertisingspeak "premier" counts as an attempt. (In which case, let's have a premier delete). --BrownHairedGirl 01:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep and cleanup: seems notable to me; plenty of smaller malls have articles. The mall has 151 stores and 1.06 mil sq. feet. -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 01:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, there is nothing extraordinary about this mall and I think a mall would have to be extraordinary to have an article. -- Kjkolb 03:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Is there a list of Malls anywhere? That would be OK for it. Tyrenius 04:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No claims as to notability of this mall over any other mall in existence.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 13:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete though some people hold that malls are automatically notable and some crappy ones got kept before. Thank God for WP:NBD. I am considering proposing mall notability guidelines, btw. Keep eyes peeled for those. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.