Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Was the Holodomor genocide?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Luna Santin 20:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Was the Holodomor genocide?

Was the Holodomor genocide? (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A classic fork created by removing an extremely important section from the Holodomor article. I already restored the section back and the fork has no reason to exist. --Irpen 21:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional delete providing the content is restored to the main Holodomor article. If a subarticle is needed, than we should use encyclopedic titles - and certainly keep a summary of the problem in the main article.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  21:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge back to main article. If the vote is to keep, at very least change the title. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 21:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Already restored at once. --Irpen 22:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
    • In which case, Delete per nom. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 01:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge/delete per Canadian-Bacon. —dima/s-ko/ 21:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per no suggestive revisionism. This shouldnt even be in the main article, as Irpen would like us to believe. Truthseeker 85.5 22:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete since it was put back in the main article. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 22:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom (assuming content was put back). --- RockMFR 00:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Kuban Cossack 01:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone else. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 13:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and merge any salvageable information. (I don't know much about the Holodomor so I can't say which facts and viewpoints need to be represented in the main article.) —Psychonaut 19:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Everything was merged back at once already. There is nothing left to merge. --Irpen 19:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.