Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WarioWare, Inc. Revolution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 22:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WarioWare, Inc. Revolution
Pure speculation. There is no proof that this game exists, or is being planned, or is even being considered. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:NOT a crystal ball. --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 01:55, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 02:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator. Blnguyen 04:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fagstein 04:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete with "speculated" int he first sentence? How could it be anything else. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 09:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have to point out, though, that "proof" is not required. A good, verifiable source citation to, say, a mainstream print publication in which, say, a columnist speculates on the game and gives a clear indication that the game will be important when it materializes, would be enough. We need a source and the source needs to be verifiability|verifiable, not "proof." It is sources that we verify, not facts. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, well, that's what I meant. There are no sources for this game. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - what dpbsmith said.--SarekOfVulcan 17:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom --TBC 18:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Speculate! 5... 4... 3... 2... 1... Deleted! (per nom.) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball. incog 19:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.