The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as OR. DS 17:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Reads like a confused piece of original research / pseudo-science. At the end of the article it turns out that it may be the teachings of a religious organisation. Unencyclopedic. -- RHaworth 13:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete Original research (as if any actual research is involved). Dipics 13:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete OR and mumbo-jumbo Lurkertalk 13:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.