Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viceroy seeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Both articles have been deleted and their creators blocked indefinitely. JIP | Talk 10:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Viceroy seeds

Delete. Obvious advertisement; author and crony have been spamming other cannabis-related articles. Prod was removed, and I can't think of any speedy criterion that fits. ... discospinster _talk 01:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating an identical page: Viceroy Seeds. ... discospinster _talk 01:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete per above. Spam, spam, eggs, and spam. Joe 01:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong & Speedy Delete... do I really need to explain my POV? --Deenoe 01:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete first spam I've seen in a long time for a worthwhile product, But still spam unfortunatel. Dlyons493 Talk 02:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, spam, nonsense. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 04:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Spammy delete - For wikipedia to publish this in my country is illegal. I wish it were a criterion for speedy deletion. Richardcavell 04:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Super strong delete for obvious reasons. Can I speedy delete it? Huh? Can I? Please? Pretty please? JIP | Talk 10:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and Protect Danny Lilithborne 10:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Why wasn't this sent to Speedy delete? Ben Aveling 10:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.