Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vexual

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  17:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vexual

protologism. Only Ghits appear to be some music CD and misspellings of "sexual": [1] --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete originally tagged it as a dicdef, but Google quickly shows why it doesn't belong. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and move to Wiktionary--Ed^{talk c E} 03:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment See Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion: wikt:Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Protologisms. If transwiki'd, it should go only on the list of protologisms page: wikt:Wiktionary:List of protologisms --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Can't comment, links are dead ends.--Ed^{talk c E} 03:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
      • try here. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
      • Pardon my lame attempt at trans-wikilinks... here's the other: Criteria for inclusion#Protologisms --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 04:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef of a proto- or neologism. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 20:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.