Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verf

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:00, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Verf

Non-encylcopedic. There's no context, and if there was, I don't think it would merit an article. I think this is also copyvio, but we'll ignore that for now. -- Reinyday, 03:25, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - It doesn't sound to be Wiki-worthy! UniReb 12:05, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Through and in the work of Verf, the visitor is invited to delete this article. Cmadler 12:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Doesn't give any context or definition. --DanielCD 12:12, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Can't understand anything they're talking about, no definition. Amren ^(talk) 14:43, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete He's a Robert Mapplethorpe style photographer, this is a copyright violation from this page, I've tagged as such. Might be German, I suppose it might fit in if someone wants to look into it and write it in a way that shows context and notability...but then again....Rx StrangeLove 19:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.