Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value Added Cost Variance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 16:07, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Value Added Cost Variance

Original research / meaningless proprietary jargon from [1]. See above Afd as well.

• D Fawcett5 18:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NOT a promotional tool. Friday (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Kjl 21:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It would need a lot more in the way of explanation and examples to give any idea of what it's talking about and why it's significant. *Dan T.* 01:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Reads like a pitch. --hydnjo talk 03:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete junk --Rogerd 04:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Useless junk. Martyman 05:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.