Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbaniacs.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Urbaniacs.com

nn website, nonsense article, 87 Google hits for "Urbaniacs". User:Zoe|^(talk) 05:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

I disagree. It's a new website -- 87 hits isn't so bad for something that's only been in existence for 7 months. Give it some time. (not sure how to put user name -- JenQ, maybe?)

• Delete This is ad copy, not an WP article. Billbrock 07:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per JenQ. Why? Because "something that's only been in existence for 7 months", only has 87 hits and is not otherwise remarkable, is by definition non-notable. If and when the site becomes more notable/famous an article can be written, but not before. p.s. to sign your posts insert four tildes at the end like so: ~~~~. This will expand like so: Zunaid 10:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. does not meet WP:WEB Agnte 14:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.