Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal McCann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Universal McCann

non-notable, advertising, vanity. Crabapplecove 03:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Promo. Daniel Case 03:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising agencies should be held to a much much higher standard. Surely, they can do a better job of promotion than this! I want Well Turned Prose! Pictures! Sound! Catchphrases! Fluff! More More More! Sock It to Me Baby! linas
• Delete as blatant WP:SPAM and no assertion of meeting WP:CORP, and add the shamelessly inserted e-mail addresses to some internet spambots, just because... I'm not really a jerk, honest! :) --Kinu ^t/_c 04:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete This is blatant advertisement. In fact, speedy delete. Valoem ^talk 15:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme violence Blatant spam like this does not deserve a five-day discussion period. It's continued presence lessens Wikipedia. --DarkAudit 17:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, ad, POV, ect. -Royalguard11^Talk 17:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I'm not sure if the company meets WP:CORP but is sure is one heck of a WP:COPYVIO with the entire article pieced together from their website -- Whpq 19:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.