Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Consulting Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Universal Consulting Group

Non-notable company, fails WP:CORP, no external sources —C.Fred (talk) 23:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Creation and edits to this page are the user's only contribs, this is plainly an advertisement. VoiceOfReason 03:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree, but it doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion. Hence the Prod/AfD route. —C.Fred (talk) 03:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I agree too, but as someone relatively new to this I've seen people use speedy delete on AfD pages where the failure of the article to meet standards was particularly obvious; I apologize if it was inappropriate. VoiceOfReason 03:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete on the basis of the first paragraph alone. Egregious marketing bullshit. Just zis Guy you know? 11:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Consultancy is notorious for tiny outfits with grand names. Piccadilly 17:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my original prod: Spammy, reads like an advertisement, doesn't seem to be notable, site has alexa ranking of 3,776,154, few google hits, the article doesn't seem to contain anything encyclopedic/salvagable. --Zoz (t) 21:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advert for non-notable company.--Runcorn 21:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.