Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States v. Schwimmer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] United States v. Schwimmer

Non notable Supreme Court case. Rory096_(block) 05:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC) I take that back (should have looked before so rashly voting to delete). The case is indeed notable and in the news. I should also note that it returns 32.300 hits on Google. Vote to keep. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - notable on uniqueness -- Tawker 05:27, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - USSC cases = notable... at least to the level I see wikipedia notability shifting... (I mean, supreme court case vs. action action album... if we can keep the latter we should have the former)... gren グレン 05:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep "Non-notable Supreme Court case" is an oxymoron. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There is no such thing as a non-notable supreme court case. Dspserpico 06:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: if kept, the article needs to be rewritten in a neutral point of view. -- Kjkolb 07:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Could you indicate more specifically on the article's talk page what parts or aspects strike you as insufficiently neutral? Lambiam^Talk 12:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and rewrite, as above. --MaNeMeBasat 09:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per CanadianCaesar. We should strive to get them all on here. GT 10:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep important and publicized Supreme Court ruling. TH 10:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Supreme Court cases are notable. --Terence Ong 14:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I'm hard pressed to think of a SCOTUS case that is not notable. Kotepho 18:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep. SCOTUS cases are virtually always highly notable, and this is not the least notable one out there. Grandmasterka 01:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)\
• Keep this case seems noteworthy as I believe many Supreme Court cases would be. Cedars 09:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I would say that all U.S. Supreme Court cases are per se notable. This article does need cleanup though. --Eastlaw 15:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I would have to agree with the above that Supreme Court cases are de facto notable. Anyway, don't say "non-notable", please! Stifle (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.