Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States military nuclear incident terminology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 13:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] United States military nuclear incident terminology

This article was originally speedy deleted because all of the terms had been individually transwikied to Wictionary (under CSD G5). A DRV consensus overturned, reasoning that -- while dicdefs aren't permissible on Wikipedia -- glossaries are sometimes permitted. Please consult the DRV before commenting here. This is a procedural listing, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Transwikied individually doesn't mean a thing here, since there is an actual context for the terms which requires explanation and also provides a useful context to have the terms put together for comparison. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 17:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per khaosworks He says it all !paradigm! 19:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)!paradigm!
• Weak Keep the article could use some work, but I don't have much of a problem with this logically related list of definitions.-- danntm ^T _C 23:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Article needs fleshing out for context and detail, but is expandable beyond definitions. Bwithh 01:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per khaosworks. The entries are more than just definitions, and wouldn't make sense at Wiktionary. -- Renesis (talk) 03:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.