Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unenrolled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Johnleemk | Talk 14:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Addendum: The page Unenrolled now redirects to Unenrolled voter. The material at Unenrolled voter is substantially different from the original article for which this AfD was made. As a result, another AfD should be proposed if deletion is warranted for the new article. --HappyCamper 14:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unenrolled, Party Government, Political commentary

Political advocacy. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Daniel Case 22:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

VERY WELL, I THOUGHT THAT VERY MUCH WAS THE PHILOSAPHY FOR UNENROLLED VOTERS. I WAS AIMING TO GIVE THIER PHILOSOPHY NOT A SOAPBOX. IF YOU CAN BETTER GIVE UNENROLLED PHILOSAPHY PLEASE DO IT OR HAVE ME REWRITE IT, BUT DO NOT DELETE IT.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merlinus (talk • contribs).

Then what I suggest you do is work on the existing Independent (voter) article, which certainly needs it at the moment. I think I'll put a merge tag on this one. Daniel Case 02:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional Keep/Rewrite - I'm not familiar enough with this concept but if the core of it is true, it would warrant an article - a serious NPOV rewrite needed. --P199 23:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all. Complete WP:OR. --Rory096 23:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete OR, and not very good. I know a lot of independents. I've never once heard any Americans describe themselves as "unenrolled". Fan1967 00:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. I suppose they're unenrolled if they're not registered to vote at all... --Rory096 03:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

After the bundling Delete All. No way to salvage an acceptable article out of any of these. Fan1967 03:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Note Author has created basically the same article under two other titles at Party Government and Political commentary. These are even worse, as they're the version before his version of reducing POV. Recommend all three be bundled into the same AfD. Fan1967 02:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Done. Daniel Case 03:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete per Fan. Joe 03:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• UPDATE 4/2/2006: AfD and merge tags have been removed by Merlinus. Will warn him. Daniel Case 22:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.