Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbuilt British Motorway Plans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of motorways in the United Kingdom. Not sure why this was relisted, it was a pretty clear consensus to merge prior to the relisting. Deathphoenix ʕ 04:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unbuilt British Motorway Plans

Delete: Granted Wikipedia is the sum of all knowledge, but I just don't think that this is really important enough for inclusion.--*Kat* 08:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge into List of motorways in the United Kingdom, which already has some of this info. ::Supergolden:: 12:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Keep: Although the current article is probably not worth keeping in its present form, the actual subject matter is very interesting, and certainly warrents a page of its own. [1] is a great place to start. Dave 21:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per Supergolden - there's not really much that can be said about these plans that's worth having a whole article for them. Let Pathetic Motorways deal with the fine details. — sjorford++ 17:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into List of motorways in the United Kingdom. Kirjtc2 19:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Xyrael / 10:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per Supergolden, &al. ~ lav-chan @ 12:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per everyone. There is something encyclopaedic about transport plans which are not built, because it allows consideration of previous forecasts for road use. David | Talk 18:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.