Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Dragon Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, but in retrospect, did seem to fit CSD A7, no assertion of notability. --Phroziac^(talk) 18:37, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ultimate Dragon Man

Mmmm, crufty vanity. --Jacquelyn Marie 03:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Walter Siegmund 05:19, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Qaz is the name I have used since forever but I don't get an article cuz of it. (do I? *hopeful grin*) Qaz ^(talk) 05:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as per Ultimate Vanity Policy^TM. Peruvianllama 06:57, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• This is not at all what I was expecting. Delete as vanity. DS 13:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Vanity pure and simple, with no worthwhile content. Filiocht | The kettle's on 14:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy as per Filiocht. Everyone knows Trogdor is the ultimate anyway. the wub "?!" 20:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.