Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TzHaar Fight Cave (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] TzHaar Fight Cave
Article is a game guide for a minigame. Should be transferred to RuneScape mini-games. Also, citations are not listed in this article. See the following pages:
No research has been done on this page AT ALL. Edtalk c E 15:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Have you merged what you can into RuneScape mini-games? CaptainVindaloo t c e 15:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- The RuneScape mini-games article is unreliable as it is already. We need sources on that page! Merging the information from TzHaar to minigames would only make matters worse. The main issue with all of the RuneScape articles is verifiability, am I not right?--Edtalk c E 16:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but if the non-cruft stuff from TzHaar Fight Cave was merged, then it is redundant, and another reason to delete. At least having completion at RuneScape mini-games is a start. Then it could be merged itself, into one of the other articles, such as Community or Locations. CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a location, it's a minigame.=) Also, completing the mini-games section could be really useful. At least a summary of the mini-game would be there. But we still have to cite our sources.=( Trying to improve these articles could take a really long time.--Edtalk c E 16:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, but the minigames must have a physical location! :-P Anyhow, do you think there is a sufficient amount of information about the Fight Cave in Minigames? If so, i'll vote delete. (By the way, the Wikibooks link is a dead end.) CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Take a look at RuneScape mini-games. Is it not a brief summary of TzHaar Fight Cave? The only difference between the two is that TzHaar contains combat info about each of the different monsters and info only interesting to players! And there's a completely ridiculous mathematical analysis of the monsters in TzHaar Fight Cave#Monstar Data. lol Anyway, I'll be willing to transfer some info to mini-games.--Edtalk c E 16:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose so. I must have been paying attention to the TzTok-Jad (however you spell it) section and wondering why that wasn't in, but I think I merged that into RuneScape monsters a while back. You could have just redirected this page to minigames though, but it might not matter. We can always create a new page as a redirect. CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Take a look at RuneScape mini-games. Is it not a brief summary of TzHaar Fight Cave? The only difference between the two is that TzHaar contains combat info about each of the different monsters and info only interesting to players! And there's a completely ridiculous mathematical analysis of the monsters in TzHaar Fight Cave#Monstar Data. lol Anyway, I'll be willing to transfer some info to mini-games.--Edtalk c E 16:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, but the minigames must have a physical location! :-P Anyhow, do you think there is a sufficient amount of information about the Fight Cave in Minigames? If so, i'll vote delete. (By the way, the Wikibooks link is a dead end.) CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a location, it's a minigame.=) Also, completing the mini-games section could be really useful. At least a summary of the mini-game would be there. But we still have to cite our sources.=( Trying to improve these articles could take a really long time.--Edtalk c E 16:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but if the non-cruft stuff from TzHaar Fight Cave was merged, then it is redundant, and another reason to delete. At least having completion at RuneScape mini-games is a start. Then it could be merged itself, into one of the other articles, such as Community or Locations. CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- The RuneScape mini-games article is unreliable as it is already. We need sources on that page! Merging the information from TzHaar to minigames would only make matters worse. The main issue with all of the RuneScape articles is verifiability, am I not right?--Edtalk c E 16:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Redundant now that everything in it has been merged into other pages. It also contains a horrific amount of fancruft. CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable/game guide. I've been hanging my nose over this article to see if anything could be leeched for the mini-games article, but there's scarcely anything except a list of monsters and a couple of nice images. It's a liability for the RS series. QuagmireDog 02:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment I'd also like to point out that whilst the mini-games article is as of yet uncited, it can't be argued that it has been abandoned. The rough edges will be hammered out and citations will be added in due course. QuagmireDog 02:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Little to say about subject, delete. ~~—The preceding unsigned comment was added by J.J.Sagnella (talk • contribs).
- sign your comments, please..............--Edtalk c E 13:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, got confused between 2 and 4 tides. J.J.Sagnella 15:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- sign your comments, please..............--Edtalk c E 13:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
