Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyranny of the breeders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 07:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tyranny of the breeders

Originally I proposed this article for deletion; the tag was removed by an unregistered user (possibly the same person as the creator). It is clearly unencyclopedic: original research, racist POV, spam. Strong delete. - Mike Rosoft 21:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Only two hits in Google. The more common term for this is "demographic warfare". --John Nagle 21:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - the concept is unique. The article could be written a lot better, but I don't see how it can be expressed in some other article. - Richardcavell 22:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or merge. While it's an interesting point, until it gets more critical discussion under this name, it doesn't even meet minimal notability guidelines.Captainktainer 22:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

• Until someone comes along with a more substantial article, I'd recommend keeping this one. (Some anon at 70.122.123.228).

• Comment how about a move to Demographic warfare? There's no such article yet. That's an emotionally charged phrase too, but searching with Google, it's used to describe at least four major ethnic conflicts in the world today, plus one in the 19th century. So a legitimate article is possible. The existing text will require some work to reach an NPOV, though. --John Nagle 02:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

With some trepedation, I've created Demographic warfare. Turns out the term dates back to 1970. The article has empty subparagraphs for every instance of demographic warfare I can find, so we're now at a stub with a neutral point of view. I'll let others fill the article in, hopefully not getting carried away in the process. --John Nagle 03:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete - notice that this article was added to Wikipedia they day before the "source article" was published, and that the "source" is a comcast.net home page; together, these facts imply that this article was added by the source's author. Let's get rid of this vanity page. --JerryOrr 15:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable. --Ashenai 14:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.