Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two by four

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Dimensional lumber. – Robert 00:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Two by four

slang Melaen 16:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete dicdef slang. — CJewell (talk to me) 16:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dimensional lumber Ruby 16:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Ruby. PJM 17:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or redirect. I think it has enough currency in the US to not be considered slang. However it probably does not have much room for expansion. I would also encourage Melaen to write more descriptive nominations for AFD. Stifle 00:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Ruby. TestPilot 05:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.