Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker Max

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP, but clean. Tagged and listed appropriately. Splash 00:00, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tucker Max

Unnotable SqueakBox 17:00, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

Old VFD is here - Alphax ^τεχ 04:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep--writer with several published books, a notable blog (Alexa ~15,000) and 50,200 google hits for his name in quotes. Meelar (talk) 17:08, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup and keep. While the article currently sucks, he's been in a few lawsuits, has a notable blog, and has written published books. Dave (talk) 17:50, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up, as above. The books have Amazon.com rankings of ~19,000 and ~27,000, which seems like it might be enough to assist in his notability. Definately needs a cleanup though. --Icelight 18:10, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup and keep. Article needs some polishing, as well as picture, this is one of the most notorious internet celebrities of our time, has a book deal, appeared on an MTV special about Internet dating, and is currently pitching a show for the major TV networks. Fonz Cockrane 20:20, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup and Keep. He is noteworthy, but currently the article doesn't do a good enough job explaining who he is. I vote to keep as long as the article is edited to explain his notorious bad behaviour (such as the information we have been debating about the 17 year old hookups). There ought to be a section titled "Character." Potatoeman57
• Keep, cleanup and remove most all material. This is a horribly-written "article"; the only material that merits mention here conserns the lawsuit, a couple of sentences on his blog and blurb about his books. --Zantastik talk 13:25, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• keep. Tucker is an important internet celebrity. period.. (preceding unsigned comment by 128.255.215.139 13:53, 4 August 2005)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.