Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trollaxor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 01:55, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Trollaxor

Not notable and a vanity offshot of the slashdot articles - Motor (talk) 10:53, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete or Speedy forum troll/fanfic author. 104 unique Google hits, definitely not-notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Or possibly merge. Trollderella 16:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per Starblind. -R. fiend 18:14, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, or merge into Slashdot trolling phenomena if his activities there were notable. — Haeleth Talk 18:39, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Starblind, or merge per Haeleth. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 20:24, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Femmina 01:28, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Notable and encyclopedic. (Just ask google)-Skrewler 01:29, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Informative article. Just because you don't agree with the contents doesn't mean its not encyclopaedic. And my google search shows ~11,000 hits. --Timecop 01:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. -- Kjkolb 08:36, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I see no reason to delete an informative article. We have extant entries here containing much less information about much more obscure subject matter. — The Tangent 07:00, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
  • User has only 8 edits almost all to this and related pages --Jaranda(^{watz sup}) 19:18, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Starblind. MCB 22:59, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Adamn 08:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Starblind --Jaranda(^{watz sup}) 19:18, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. He's a guy with a website. Big deal. Making yourself annoying on the internet is hardly a claim to fame. Friday (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.