Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Preparatory School

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 ^talk July 4, 2005 15:39 (UTC)

[edit] Trinity Preparatory School

No evidence of notability. --W(t) 19:35, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)

• Keep, no reason to delete. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:00, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
• Keep. Can we leave the schools alone already? Pburka 21:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. DS1953 22:09, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, see Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments. Kappa 23:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep No evidence that it should be deleted any more than all the others we've voted to keep. CalJW 00:04, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 19:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability. --Carnildo 03:33, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep verifiable and NPOV schools. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:08, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Say, all you keep voters, could you tell me how many other Trinity Preparatory Schools there are in the US? How many in the UK? How many in Australia? How many in New Zealand? Does that mean anything to you? What, in the article, sets this particular usage of the name from all the others? Is it that X and Y (wikilinked, of course!) gave the land? Is it that this one is in Florida? (How many are in Florida?) Have any of you looked at Peterson's Guide to Private Schools? Delete on the grounds that the article does not establish any discussion or contextualization of the subject and the subject is not presented in a way to make clear any significance. Geogre 05:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • When another Trinity Preparatory School gets a wikipedia page we can turn this one into a disambiguation page. And the land wasn't donated by Lake Martha as far as I can tell. Rather, she appears to be a large geographical feature which, in my opinion, is inherently notable. Pburka 12:27, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, I've thought about those points so you needn't mention them again. CalJW 18:11, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • These are valid points but are reasons for expansion and improvement, not deletion. Christopher Parham (talk) 22:37, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
  • Geogre, if you're actually concerned about other Trinity Preparatory Schools, be constructive and create some articles about them. Let me know, and I will work on expanding any such stubs you make. Factitious June 28, 2005 08:35 (UTC)
• Keep — although this page could be readily merged with the town page. — RJH 03:22, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. All schools are notable enough for a truly great encyclopaedia. —RaD Man (talk) 28 June 2005 07:52 (UTC)
• Keep. Verifiable, notable, encyclopedic. No advantages to deleting this information. Factitious June 28, 2005 08:35 (UTC)
• Keep Inherent notability of schools. Unfocused 29 June 2005 00:35 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.