Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainwreck (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No consensus - suggestion to merge. Thryduulf 17:44, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Trainwreck (band)
- Delete Does not meet the music group guidelines, non-notable band with only one self-made CD. Coolgamer 19:53, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Kyle Gass, who does meet notability. --keepsleeping say what 20:27, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect and merge to Kyle Gass. feydey 22:12, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per WP:Music. Has a prominent member in Kyle Gass and has toured with the Reverend Horton Heat and The Supersuckers see [1]. The producer of their forthcoming album has worked on albums by Beck and Garbage. Capitalistroadster 00:18, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Have rewritten article to show notability as per WP:music. Capitalistroadster 01:05, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment, still the article does not meet WP:MUSIC, with point 5. ... one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise extremely notable, Tenacious D having released only one album barely itself meets the criteria, having known actor Jack Black in it makes it somewhat noticeable, also ... note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects - this is why i voted for a redirect; 2. ... a national concert tour - looks like Trainwreck has "toured America supporting..." so that's nothing special. This is why i will for now keep the vote as it is. -feydey 10:51, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment (no vote). I agree that the band meets WP:MUSIC (I consider Tenacious D a big enough deal to meet point 5). My personal feeling, though I'm not voting, is that this article probably won't ever get much bigger, and therefore doesn't need its own space. But really, I'd be fine with it staying there, or being merged with Kyle Gass -- whatever, so long as the information is not lost. If a merge takes place, a redirect is a very good idea. --Jacquelyn Marie 03:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.