Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Train the Trainer/2005-03-08
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 23:53, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Train the Trainer
Er, what? Self-promoting nonsense, bordering on patent. Delete. -- Plutor 14:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup it's a term used for courses and such designed for training persons who will eventually be teachers of some sort, particularly in corporate training programs and the like. It isn't self-promotion or nonsense. I find it hard to keep such an oddly-worded substub, but with 979,000 Google hits (exact phrase) I can't easily vote to delete it either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:43, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and send to cleanup/request for expansion. - Mailer Diablo 18:15, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup, as noted above. Barno 18:38, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, ok, the phrase exists, but there's no article here except fork fodder. Wyss 01:38, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as circular definition. Radiant! 09:03, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Move to Wiktionary. Dicdef. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:06, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- The phrase certainly exists and is in active use. There might be something useful to say about the strengths and weaknesses of this particularly long-running management fad. The current content, however, is a mere dicdef. Keep for now but transwiki if not significantly expanded in a reasonable time. If kept, move to the correct capitalization - train the trainer. Rossami (talk) 00:10, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that Wiktionary would want it. Things that aren't single parts of speech are dodgy. Uncle G 22:10, 2005 Mar 11 (UTC)
- Keep, real term - David Gerard 00:18, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, useless. Edeans 20:47, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
