Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Town Topics (newspaper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep ~ trialsanderrors 05:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Town Topics (newspaper)

Town Topics (newspaper) (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Bringing here as the prod tag was removed previously and placed on it again. It was prodded as a non-notable newspaper. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 04:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

• Really weak delete. It seems to just fall beneath notability criteria. By the way, before anyone tries this, being in Princeton does not confer notability. -Amarkov ^babble 04:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nominatory. Black-Velvet 08:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. In light of recent evidence. Black-Velvet 07:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete per nom. utcursch | talk 11:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Article can be made into an informative one. --Falcorian ^(talk) 19:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep As I posted on the article, In 1946, Emily Stuart helped her husband and other relatives establish a weekly newspaper called Town Topics that has been published in Princeton since 1946. On April 4, 1989, Emily Stuart, 74, was found stabbed to death in the basement of her stately Mercer Street home in a quiet neighborhood near Princeton University. This family owned paper has been around since 1946. Given that its family owned, the stabbing event, and that the paper has been around since 1946, more research is bound to reveal enough information to move the article well above the notability criteria threshold. -- Jreferee 07:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Mild Keep This paper has a readership of 34,000, which is significantly larger than most of my random sampling of weekly newspapers with articles here. Kathy A. 20:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.